Back to Blog
    Career Stories 8 min read Mar 20, 2026

    OSCP vs eJPT: Which Should You Tackle First?

    OSCP is the gold standard, but it's brutal for true beginners. Here's a practical decision framework for choosing your first hands-on offensive cert.

    The short answer

    If you've never run an exploit end-to-end, start with eJPT. If you can already pop a Windows box from foothold to admin in under an hour, you're ready for OSCP.

    What each cert actually tests

    eJPT (INE)

  1. Fully practical, performance-based
  2. 48-hour exam window
  3. Beginner-friendly methodology
  4. Focuses on basic enumeration, exploitation, and post-exploitation
  5. ~$250

    6. OSCP (Offensive Security)

  6. Brutal, 24-hour practical exam
  7. Requires methodology, persistence, and real research skill
  8. Heavy on Active Directory exploitation
  9. Covers buffer overflows (the new exam reduced this), web, AD, Linux escalation
  10. ~$1,600+ with lab time

    11. The real decision

    Ask yourself three questions:

    1. Have I spent at least 100 hours in HackTheBox or TryHackMe rooms? If no → eJPT first.

    2. Can I enumerate a host, find a vector, exploit it, and pivot — without checking a walkthrough? If no → eJPT first.

    3. Is my goal to land a junior pentest role in 6 months? If yes → eJPT now, OSCP after the role.

    The career math

  11. eJPT alone won't get you a pentest job at a top firm.
  12. OSCP alone (without supporting evidence — write-ups, CTF presence, GitHub) won't either.
  13. eJPT + 50 HTB boxes documented + active Twitter/Discord presence has gotten more juniors hired in our network than naked OSCPs.

    14. How LearnCyberspace approaches this

    Our offensive track does both — eJPT prep with weekly box reviews, then OSCP prep cohorts that meet twice a week through the lab time. The structure dramatically improves first-attempt OSCP pass rates.

    ← Read more articles